Figure 5. Annexin A5 resistance assays for patient plasma groups. The annexin A5 anticoagulant ratio for the aPL syndrome with thromboembolism group (A) was significantly decreased (mean ± SD, 182 ± 31%, n = 25) compared with the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) (210 ± 35% [n = 26], P < .01), the non-aPL thromboembolism group (C) (229 ± 16% [n = 15], P < .001), and the healthy control group (D) (231 ± 14% [n = 30], P < .001). The ratio for the plasmas from the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) also was significantly reduced compared with the healthy control group (D) (P < .05). There were no significant differences in annexin A5 anticoagulant ratio for the non-aPL thromboembolism group (C) compared with the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) and the healthy control group (D). Error bars are shown for mean ± 2 SD of normal healthy controls (D).
Figure 5.

Annexin A5 resistance assays for patient plasma groups. The annexin A5 anticoagulant ratio for the aPL syndrome with thromboembolism group (A) was significantly decreased (mean ± SD, 182 ± 31%, n = 25) compared with the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) (210 ± 35% [n = 26], P < .01), the non-aPL thromboembolism group (C) (229 ± 16% [n = 15], P < .001), and the healthy control group (D) (231 ± 14% [n = 30], P < .001). The ratio for the plasmas from the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) also was significantly reduced compared with the healthy control group (D) (P < .05). There were no significant differences in annexin A5 anticoagulant ratio for the non-aPL thromboembolism group (C) compared with the aPL antibodies without thrombosis history group (B) and the healthy control group (D). Error bars are shown for mean ± 2 SD of normal healthy controls (D).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal