Figure 3.
Direct MECOM gene network is repressed in primary leukemia cells. (A) UMAP of 40 866 cells derived from 11 patients with leukemias driven by MLLrs sequenced using scRNA-seq. UMAPs were colored from top to bottom by patient, whether MECOM is expressed, and MECOM expression counts per cell. (B) Same UMAPs as panel A and colored by the expression signatures of normal HSCs and normal monocytes derived from Lambo et al36 and MECOM-regulated genes identified to be activated after depletion of MECOM (Figure 2). (C) Quantification of the 3 signatures from panel B compared between MECOM-positive leukemias (n = 5) and MECOM-negative leukemias (n = 6). Comparisons were performed by randomly taking the average over 10 iterations of 1000 randomly sampled cells from both samples expressing MECOM and samples not expressing MECOM to avoid uninformative P values close to 0. Significance was calculated using 2-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests corrected for multiple testing using BH. (D) Differential expression of all analyzed genes (n = 28 113) between leukemias expressing MECOM and leukemias that did not express MECOM. Differential expression was performed using MAST using 10 iterations of 1000 randomly selected MECOM-positive cells and 1000 randomly selected MECOM-negative cells to prevent uninformative P values. BH corrected P values and log fold changes shown are the average of 10 iterations. BH, Benjamini-Hochberg; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection.

Direct MECOM gene network is repressed in primary leukemia cells. (A) UMAP of 40 866 cells derived from 11 patients with leukemias driven by MLLrs sequenced using scRNA-seq. UMAPs were colored from top to bottom by patient, whether MECOM is expressed, and MECOM expression counts per cell. (B) Same UMAPs as panel A and colored by the expression signatures of normal HSCs and normal monocytes derived from Lambo et al36 and MECOM-regulated genes identified to be activated after depletion of MECOM (Figure 2). (C) Quantification of the 3 signatures from panel B compared between MECOM-positive leukemias (n = 5) and MECOM-negative leukemias (n = 6). Comparisons were performed by randomly taking the average over 10 iterations of 1000 randomly sampled cells from both samples expressing MECOM and samples not expressing MECOM to avoid uninformative P values close to 0. Significance was calculated using 2-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests corrected for multiple testing using BH. (D) Differential expression of all analyzed genes (n = 28 113) between leukemias expressing MECOM and leukemias that did not express MECOM. Differential expression was performed using MAST using 10 iterations of 1000 randomly selected MECOM-positive cells and 1000 randomly selected MECOM-negative cells to prevent uninformative P values. BH corrected P values and log fold changes shown are the average of 10 iterations. BH, Benjamini-Hochberg; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal