Table 3.

Logistic regression predicting receipt of any HMA in patients with MDS and duration of HMA therapy among patients who received at least 1 HMA cycle

Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Receipt of HMAReceipt of 1-3 vs ≥4 HMA cycles
Age at index date, y   
66-74 Referent Referent 
75-84 0.81 (0.76-0.86) 0.96 (0.86-1.08) 
≥85 0.41 (0.38-0.44) 0.78 (0.66-0.93) 
Sex   
Male Referent Referent 
Female 0.81 (0.77-0.86) 0.99 (0.89-1.1) 
Race   
White Referent Referent 
Black 0.70 (0.62-0.80) 1.00 (0.77-1.30) 
Other 0.78 (0.68-0.90) 0.87 (0.66-1.15) 
No. of cytopenia   
0 or 1 Referent Referent 
2 or 3 2.08 (1.96-2.20) 0.69 (0.61-0.78) 
TB    
Independent Referent Referent 
Low 3.32 (3.13-3.52) 1.31 (1.16-1.48) 
Medium or high 6.11 (5.53-6.75) 1.06 (0.90-1.26) 
DE (BM biopsy) 12.61 (10.78-14.74) 0.94 (0.64-1.39) 
Nursing home 0.55 (0.47-0.63) 0.64 (0.46-0.90) 
Poverty (census tract)    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.94 (0.86-1.03) 0.97 (0.82-1.14) 
Medium-high 1.04 (0.95-1.14) 0.92 (0.76-1.10) 
High 0.99 (0.89-1.10) 0.84 (0.68-1.03) 
Without high school degree    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.91 (0.84-0.99) 1.04 (0.89-1.22) 
Medium-high 0.96 (0.88-1.05) 1.01 (0.84-1.20) 
High 0.88 (0.80-0.98) 1.15 (0.94-1.41) 
RUCC§    
1 or missing (metro) Referent Referent 
2 to 3 1.06 (0.99-1.14) 1.14 (1.00-1.30) 
>3 0.93 (0.85-1.02) 1.06 (0.89-1.26) 
General internal medicine specialists    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.92 (0.85-1.00) 1.16 (1.00-1.35) 
Medium-high 0.86 (0.79-0.94) 1.12 (0.94-1.32) 
High 0.86 (0.79-0.94) 0.96 (0.80-1.14) 
Frailty index    
Nonfrail Referent Referent 
Prefrail 0.67 (0.59-0.76) 0.89 (0.71-1.11) 
Mildly frail 0.32 (0.28-0.37) 0.61 (0.48-0.78) 
Moderately or severely frail 0.16 (0.13-0.20) 0.50 (0.34-0.75) 
HMA type   
Azacitidine NA Referent 
Decitabine NA 0.70 (0.62-0.78) 
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Receipt of HMAReceipt of 1-3 vs ≥4 HMA cycles
Age at index date, y   
66-74 Referent Referent 
75-84 0.81 (0.76-0.86) 0.96 (0.86-1.08) 
≥85 0.41 (0.38-0.44) 0.78 (0.66-0.93) 
Sex   
Male Referent Referent 
Female 0.81 (0.77-0.86) 0.99 (0.89-1.1) 
Race   
White Referent Referent 
Black 0.70 (0.62-0.80) 1.00 (0.77-1.30) 
Other 0.78 (0.68-0.90) 0.87 (0.66-1.15) 
No. of cytopenia   
0 or 1 Referent Referent 
2 or 3 2.08 (1.96-2.20) 0.69 (0.61-0.78) 
TB    
Independent Referent Referent 
Low 3.32 (3.13-3.52) 1.31 (1.16-1.48) 
Medium or high 6.11 (5.53-6.75) 1.06 (0.90-1.26) 
DE (BM biopsy) 12.61 (10.78-14.74) 0.94 (0.64-1.39) 
Nursing home 0.55 (0.47-0.63) 0.64 (0.46-0.90) 
Poverty (census tract)    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.94 (0.86-1.03) 0.97 (0.82-1.14) 
Medium-high 1.04 (0.95-1.14) 0.92 (0.76-1.10) 
High 0.99 (0.89-1.10) 0.84 (0.68-1.03) 
Without high school degree    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.91 (0.84-0.99) 1.04 (0.89-1.22) 
Medium-high 0.96 (0.88-1.05) 1.01 (0.84-1.20) 
High 0.88 (0.80-0.98) 1.15 (0.94-1.41) 
RUCC§    
1 or missing (metro) Referent Referent 
2 to 3 1.06 (0.99-1.14) 1.14 (1.00-1.30) 
>3 0.93 (0.85-1.02) 1.06 (0.89-1.26) 
General internal medicine specialists    
Low or missing Referent Referent 
Medium-low 0.92 (0.85-1.00) 1.16 (1.00-1.35) 
Medium-high 0.86 (0.79-0.94) 1.12 (0.94-1.32) 
High 0.86 (0.79-0.94) 0.96 (0.80-1.14) 
Frailty index    
Nonfrail Referent Referent 
Prefrail 0.67 (0.59-0.76) 0.89 (0.71-1.11) 
Mildly frail 0.32 (0.28-0.37) 0.61 (0.48-0.78) 
Moderately or severely frail 0.16 (0.13-0.20) 0.50 (0.34-0.75) 
HMA type   
Azacitidine NA Referent 
Decitabine NA 0.70 (0.62-0.78) 

DE, diagnostic evaluation; NA, not applicable.

This analysis included all patients with MDS (n = 5941) regardless of the type of HMA received, azacitidine (n = 4302) and decitabine (n = 1639).

TB at diagnosis is based on a 16-week window before and after the index date. Low, moderate, and high TBs were defined as 1 to 3, 4 to 7, and ≥8 unique dates of transfusions during the 16-week before and after index date.

Percent individuals with incomes <100% of the federal poverty level (in quartiles).

Educational attainment based on the percent of adults (aged >25 years) without high school diploma.

§

The 2013 RUCCs are from the US Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service website: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx. The codes form a classification scheme that distinguishes metro counties by the population size of their metro area and nonmetropolitan counties by degree of urbanization and adjacency to a metro area.

Availability of providers per 100 000 population, including for general internal medicine and internal medicine subspecialties (doctors of medicine and doctors of osteopathic medicine).

Frailty was defined by the frailty score defined as: <0.1, nonfrail; 0.1 to 0.19, prefrail; 0.2 to 0.29, mildly frail; ≥0.3, moderately or severely frail.19 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal